In this seminar, we will explore the emergence of research-creation as an academic field that highlights the potential of artistic practice as research and making as a form of knowledge creation in and of itself. We will contextualize this field’s emergence as sharing roots with various social movements across the Americas. By framing the turn towards research-creation as a critique of dominant epistemologies and disciplinary boundaries, we will highlight and understand its connections to feminisms, critical race theory, and decolonial approaches.
The course will be a reading-intensive, extended seminar-style investigation of debates in research-creation as it relates to feminisms, critical race theory, and decolonial approaches across the Americas. To emphasize the relevance of these readings for research-creation projects, each set of readings will be paired with a series of art projects. Each week students will develop oral presentations and guide discussions on the readings and case studies assigned. For the final project, students will be given the option to write a final essay based on course readings, a critical artist’s statement about their own creative work, or to develop a new or work on an existing research-creation project.
Course level- educational goals:
The student will be able to:
- Identify key approaches in research-creation;
- Apply these key approaches in the description and analysis of research-creation case studies;
- Prepare, guide, and participate substantively in discussions across the range of texts included in the course readings;
- Deliver short oral and written presentations summarizing how research-creation is informed by feminism(s), critical race theory and decolonial approaches;
- Develop a research-creation project or a critical artist statement about the student’s own previous creative work, considering and situating it within a Research-Creation framework.
- Engage in scholarly writing more effectively.
Assignments and Evaluation
A. Weekly discussion presentation – 20%
Each week a student (or group of students) will be responsible for leading the seminar.
** Depending on the number of students the discussions may be led by an individual student or by a group of students. Guidelines and expectations on how to conduct a discussion will be provided on the first day of classes.
B. Weekly Reading Summaries – 25%
At the beginning of each seminar, all students will post a summary of the readings assigned for that week. The summaries should be no more than 1500 words. They should identify the main arguments in the readings, draw connections between them and discuss how they relate with your own field of research. The summaries should be written in correct English grammar and properly cited. The objective of the summaries is to prepare you for in-class discussion; help you develop the framework for your final project; and advance your AB if relevant.
C. Final Project – 45%
- Proposal Presentation: (500 words Abstract and Annotated Bibliography) (10%)
- Peer Review: You will review the proposal of another student, not your own project. (10%)
- Final Essay/Project (see options below) (25%)
Option 1: Write a 5000-word argumentative essay or critical analysis based on the readings and/or an art project presented in class. This option could be used as a conference paper or a book review or to advance an article or your AB.
Option 2: Write a 5000- self-reflective essay on one or various the themes of the class focusing on how they’ve changed your approach to research and/or your research project.: How would your current project look like if it was situated within a Research-Creation framework? What media/format would you use to develop it? How would it circulate across disciplines (as a boundary object)? Where would you publish and/or exhibit it? What kind of questions could you ask? What are its limits? This self-reflective essay can incorporate notes, reflections, reading summaries, images, etc.
Option 3: Develop a Research-Creation Project. This project can be based on an existing project or a new project. If it is an existing project, there should be clear evidence of advances/changes done in the context of this class and should be situated within a Research-Creation framework. It will combine independent research and creative output, based on each student’s skills and interests. The creative portion will be a small-scale prototype (depending on skills and access to materials). Emphasis will be placed on process, questions, problem-solving, and evolution, rather than on a polished finished “product.” This could be a place to test a method considered within the reasonable scope of the semester. This project includes a written justification of 3000-5000 words + the small-scale prototype.
Option 4: Produce a critical artist statement about the student’s own previous creative work, considering and situating it within the Research-Creation framework. This statement could later become part of the dissertation or could be used as a conference paper, or an exhibition/performance statement, etc. This option could be useful for students with an active artistic/creative practice.
D. General Attendance and Participation – (10%) mandatory
In a discussion-based graduate seminar like this one, attendance and participation in class discussions are of crucial importance. If you face any difficulties attending class, please be pro-active and speak to me in advance to make other arrangements for your participation. If you miss more than one class, you will jeopardize your standing in the seminar.
WEEK 1 – INTRODUCTIONS
Readings Assigned for WK 2:
- Sawchuk, K. and Chapman, O.(2012) “Research-Creation: Intervention, Analysis and Family resemblances” Canadian Journal of Communication Vol 37 (2012), 5-26.
- Nathalie Loveless, How to Make Art at the End of the World; A Manifesto for Research-Creation (Duke University Press, 2019) “Chp. 1 Art in the Expanded Field (p. 1- 18)
- Tara Rodgers, (2012). “How Art and Research Inform One Another, or Choose Your Own Adventure” Canadian Journal of Communication Vol 37, p 155-161
- Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Maria Paula Meneses (2019). Knowledges Born in the Struggle :Constructing the Epistemologies of the Global South ( Chp 13 Decolonizing the University, 220-239).
Other Resources:
- Arturo Escobar, Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press 2018. (Excerpts, Introduction, p. 1- 21) VIA SFU LIBRARY DATABASE
- Chapman, O. & Sawchuk, K. (2015). “Creation-as-Research: Critical Making in Complex Environments”. RACAR : Revue d’art canadienne / Canadian Art Review, 40 (1), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.7202/1032753ar
WEEK 2 WHAT IS RESEARCH-CREATION?
Discussion of Readings Assigned (WK 1) and Reading Summary
Readings Assigned for WK 3:
- Patricia Hill Collins. (2019). Intersectionality as critical social theory / Patricia Hill Collins. Duke University Press. (Excerpts, Introduction p. 1-18 and Chp. 3 How Power Matters,p. 87-120)
- Nathalie Loveless, How to Make Art at the End of the World; A Manifesto for Research-Creation (Duke University Press, 2019) “Chp. 2 Disciplines” (p. 38- 58).
- The Combahee River Collective Statement https://combaheerivercollective.weebly.com/the-combahee-river-collective-statement.html
- Pick ONE of these short essays from Cherrie Moraga and Gloría Anzalduá, This Bridge Called My Back” (4th Edition- excerpts):
- Cherrie Moraga, ”Catching Fire:Preface to the Fourth Edition( xv-xxiv),
- Audre Lorde, ”The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle The Master’s House” (94-97);
- Mistuye Yamada, “Asian Pacific Women and Feminism” (68-72).
Other Resources:
- Crenshaw, K. (1991). “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” In Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. doi:10.2307/1229039
WEEK 3- INTERSECTIONALITY & INTERDISCIPLINARITY
Discussion of Readings Assigned (WK2) and Reading Summary.
Readings assigned for WK 4:
- Rossi Braidotti, “Writing as a Nomadic Subject”, In Comparative Critical Studies 11.2–3 (2014): 163–184
- Gloría Anzalduá, La Frontera San Francisco : Aunt Lute Books 2012 (Excerpts: La conciencia de la mestiza = Towards a new consciousness)
- Claudia Rankine, Citizen: An American Lyric (Excerpts)
- Chantal Gibson, How She Read (Excerpts)
Other Resources:
- Ahmed, Sara. 2010. “Orientations Matter.” In New materialisms : ontology, agency, and politics, edited by Diana H. Coole and Samantha Frost, 234-257. Durham : Duke University Press.
- Anzaldúa, Gloria, and Ana Louise Keating. Light in the Dark = Luz En Lo Oscuro : Rewriting Identity, Spirituality, Reality / Gloria E. Anzaldúa ; Edited by Ana Louise Keating. Duke University Press, 2015. VIA SFU LIBRARY DATABASE
WEEK 4- SUBJECTS
Special Guest Chantal Gibson
Discussion of Readings Assigned (WK 3) and Reading Summary
Readings assigned for WK 5:
- Coleman, Beth. 2009. “Race as Technology.” In Camera Obscura 24, no. 170: 177-207
- Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2009. “Race and/as Technology, or How to Do Things to Race. (Links to an external site.)” (Links to an external site.)Camera Obscura 24, no. 1: 7-34.
- Noble, S. U., & Tynes, B. M. (2016). The Intersectional Internet : Race, Sex, Class, and Culture Online / Safiya Umoja Noble, Brendesha M. Tynes.(1st, New ed.). (Excerpts, Introduction Available via SFU Library Databases)
- Benjamin Ruha, “Are Robots Racists?” (watch video)
- Explore the work of: Stephanie Dinkins, https://www.stephaniedinkins.com/projects; Sondra Perry, https://sondraperry.com/by-image and Mary Flanagan https://maryflanagan.com/
Other Resources:
- Benjamin, Ruha. Race after Technology : Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity, 2019.
- Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge, 2000.
WEEK 5- RACE AND TECHNOLOGY
Discussion of Readings Assigned (WK4) and Reading Summary WK 4
Readings assigned for WK 8
- Nathalie Loveless, Chapter 1 “Haraway’s Dog” In Making Art at the End of the World.
- Nathalie Loveless, Chapter 4 “Drives” In Making Art at the End of the World.
- Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out : classification and its consequences / Geoffrey C. Bowker, Susan Leigh Star. MIT Press. (Introduction, To Classify is Human, 1-33). VIA SFU LIBRARY
- Explore the work of James Luna -The Artifact Piece- 1986.
- https://hyperallergic.com/433437/james-luna-performance-artist-memorial/
- Explore the work: Wrapped in the Cloud by Meghann O’Brien, 2018. Produced in collaboration with Conrad Sly, Hannah Turner, Reese Muntean, Jaimie Issac, and Kate Hennessy.
Other Resources:
- Jane Bennett (2010). Vibrant matter a political ecology of things / Jane Bennett. Duke University Press. ( Excerpts: The Force of Things. p 1-19)
WEEK 6- READING BREAK
Students prepare presentations of final project proposals and bring boundary objects/things to think with.
WEEK 7- STUDENT PRESENTATIONS
Special Guest- Kate Hennessy
Student’s Project Proposal Presentations
WEEK 8 – OBJECTS & THINGS TO THINK WITH
Discussion of Readings Assigned (WK 8) and Reading Summary
Readings assigned for WK.9
- Hito Steyerl, Aesthetics of Resistance? Artistic Research as Discipline and Conflict
- Lucy Cotter, “Introduction” in Reclaiming Artistic Research or Lucy Cotter, Artistic Research and TheFuture
- Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Toward an Aesthetics of the Epistemologies of the south Manifesto in Twenty-Two Theses In
- Explore the work of Christian Nyampeta, Hito Steyerl, and New Monuments for New Cities Projects.
WEEK 9 – ART AS RESEARCH
Discussion of Readings Assigned (WK 9) and Reading Summary
Readings assigned for WK 10:
- Claire Bishop, “The Social Turn: Collaborations and Its Discontents” In Artificial hells: participatory art and the politics of spectatorship”
- Lois Klassen, “Figurations Following the Ethical Turn” In Parse Journal, Issue 1, Spring 2020
- Eve Tuk, Suspending Damage: A Letter to Communities, Harvard Educational Review Vol. 79 No. 3 Fall 2009
- Explore the work of Jordan Scott, Lanterns at Guantanamo https://lanternsatguantanamo.ca/
- Explore the work of Lawrence Abu Hamdan, Saydnaya and Eyewitness Inventory
Other Resources:
- Fisher, C. (2015). Mentoring Research-Creation: Secrets, Strategies, and Beautiful Failures. RACAR : Revue d’art canadienne / Canadian Art Review, 40 (1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.7202/1032752ar
- Cynthia Noury, Mariane Cloutier and Marie Christie Roy “A toolbox for promoting responsible conduct in Research-Creation, 2018 – A toolkit developed by researchers based in Quebec as s part of the research project Responsible Conduct in Research-Creation: Providing Creative Tools to Meet the Challenges of an Emerging Field ( 2016-2018). The toolkit includes case studies and a checklist. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/20924
WEEK 10 FAILURES AND ETHICS & STUDENT PRESENTATIONS
Discussion of Readings Assigned (WK 10) and Reading Summary
Readings assigned for WK 11 :
- Cusicanqui, S. R. “Ch’ixinakax Utxiwa: A Reflection on the Practices and Discourses of Decolonization.” In The South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 111, no. 1, 2012, pp. 95–109.
- Epistemic Extractivism: A Dialogue with Alberto Acosta, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, and Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui By Ramón Grosfoguel In Knowledges Born in the Struggle Constructing the Epistemologies of the Global South
- Tuk. E. Supending Damaage a Letter to Communities. August 2009. Harvard Educational Review 79(3)
- Explore the project by Sara Garzón, Notes for a horizontality: Toward the Possibility of Becoming Together as an Assemblage. https://coleccioncisneros.org/editorial/featured/notes-horizon-tality
- Explore the work of INVASORIX and Sebastian Calfuqueo
WEEK 11 – DECOLONIAL HORIZONS AND OTHER POSSIBLE WORLDS & STUDENT PRESENTATIONS
Discussion of Readings Assigned (WK 10) and Reading Summary
WEEK 12 – No classes
WEEK 13 – FINAL PROJECT PRESENTATIONS